<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" version="3" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-07" indexInclude="true" ipr="trust200902" number="9027" prepTime="2021-06-03T22:54:56" scripts="Common,Latin" sortRefs="true" submissionType="IETF" symRefs="true" tocDepth="3" tocInclude="true" xml:lang="en">
  <link href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-07" rel="prev"/>
  <link href="https://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc9027" rel="alternate"/>
  <link href="urn:issn:2070-1721" rel="alternate"/>
  <front>
    <title abbrev="RPH Values for Emergency Services">Assertion Values for Resource Priority Header and SIP Priority Header Claims in Support of Emergency Services Networks</title>
    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9027" stream="IETF"/>
    <author initials="M." surname="Dolly" fullname="Martin Dolly">
      <organization showOnFrontPage="true">AT&amp;T</organization>
      <address>
        <email>md3135@att.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="Chris Wendt">
      <organization showOnFrontPage="true">Comcast</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Comcast Technology Center</street>
          <city>Philadelphia</city>
          <region>PA</region>
          <code>19103</code>
          <country>United States of America</country>
        </postal>
        <email>chris-ietf@chriswendt.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date month="06" year="2021"/>
    <area>ART</area>
    <workgroup>STIR</workgroup>
    <keyword>rph</keyword>
    <keyword>PASSporT</keyword>
    <keyword>esnet</keyword>
    <abstract pn="section-abstract">
      <t indent="0" pn="section-abstract-1">This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority Header ("rph") claim and a new SIP Priority Header ("sph") claim for protection of the "psap-callback" value as part of the "rph" Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) extension in support of the security of emergency services networks for emergency call origination and callback.</t>
    </abstract>
    <boilerplate>
      <section anchor="status-of-memo" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-boilerplate.1">
        <name slugifiedName="name-status-of-this-memo">Status of This Memo</name>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-boilerplate.1-1">
            This is an Internet Standards Track document.
        </t>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-boilerplate.1-2">
            This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
            (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
            received public review and has been approved for publication by
            the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further
            information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of 
            RFC 7841.
        </t>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-boilerplate.1-3">
            Information about the current status of this document, any
            errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
            <eref target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9027" brackets="none"/>.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="copyright" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-boilerplate.2">
        <name slugifiedName="name-copyright-notice">Copyright Notice</name>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-boilerplate.2-1">
            Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
            document authors. All rights reserved.
        </t>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-boilerplate.2-2">
            This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
            Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
            (<eref target="https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info" brackets="none"/>) in effect on the date of
            publication of this document. Please review these documents
            carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
            respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
            document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
            Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
            warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
        </t>
      </section>
    </boilerplate>
    <toc>
      <section anchor="toc" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="exclude" pn="section-toc.1">
        <name slugifiedName="name-table-of-contents">Table of Contents</name>
        <ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1">
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.1">
            <t indent="0" keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.1.1"><xref derivedContent="1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-1"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-introduction">Introduction</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.2">
            <t indent="0" keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.2.1"><xref derivedContent="2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-2"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-terminology">Terminology</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.3">
            <t indent="0" keepWithNext="true" pn="section-toc.1-1.3.1"><xref derivedContent="3" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-3"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-new-assertion-values-for-rp">New Assertion Values for "rph" Claim</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.4">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.4.1"><xref derivedContent="4" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-4"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-the-sip-priority-header-sph">The SIP Priority Header ("sph") Claim</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.5">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.5.1"><xref derivedContent="5" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-5"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-order-of-claim-keys">Order of Claim Keys</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.6">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.6.1"><xref derivedContent="6" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-6"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-compact-form-of-passport">Compact Form of PASSporT</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.7">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.7.1"><xref derivedContent="7" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-7"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-iana-considerations">IANA Considerations</xref></t>
            <ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.7.2">
              <li pn="section-toc.1-1.7.2.1">
                <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.7.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="7.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-7.1"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-json-web-token-claims">JSON Web Token Claims</xref></t>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.8">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.8.1"><xref derivedContent="8" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-8"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-security-considerations">Security Considerations</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.9">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.1"><xref derivedContent="9" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-references">References</xref></t>
            <ul bare="true" empty="true" indent="2" spacing="compact" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2">
              <li pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.1">
                <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.1.1"><xref derivedContent="9.1" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9.1"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-normative-references">Normative References</xref></t>
              </li>
              <li pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.2">
                <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.9.2.2.1"><xref derivedContent="9.2" format="counter" sectionFormat="of" target="section-9.2"/>.  <xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-informative-references">Informative References</xref></t>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.10">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.10.1"><xref derivedContent="" format="none" sectionFormat="of" target="section-appendix.a"/><xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-acknowledgements">Acknowledgements</xref></t>
          </li>
          <li pn="section-toc.1-1.11">
            <t indent="0" pn="section-toc.1-1.11.1"><xref derivedContent="" format="none" sectionFormat="of" target="section-appendix.b"/><xref derivedContent="" format="title" sectionFormat="of" target="name-authors-addresses">Authors' Addresses</xref></t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </toc>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-1">
      <name slugifiedName="name-introduction">Introduction</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-1-1">"Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization" <xref target="RFC8443" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8443"/> extended the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in <xref target="RFC8225" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8225"/> to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority' header field <xref target="RFC4412" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC4412"/>. <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="EMERGENCY-CALLS"/> introduces the need and justification for the protection of both the SIP 'Resource-Priority' and 'Priority' header fields, used for categorizing the priority use of the call in the telephone network, specifically for emergency calls.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-1-2">Compromise of the SIP 'Resource-Priority' or 'Priority' header fields could lead to misuse of network resources (i.e., during congestion scenarios), impacting the application services supported using the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field and the handling of Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-1-3"><xref target="RFC8225" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8225"/> allows extensions by which an authority on the originating side verifying the authorization of a particular communication for the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field or the SIP 'Priority' header field can use PASSporT claims to cryptographically sign the information associated with either the SIP 'Resource-Priority' or the 'Priority' header field and convey assertion of those values by the signing party authorization.  A signed SIP 'Resource-Priority' or 'Priority' header field will allow a receiving entity (including entities located in different network domains/boundaries) to verify the validity of assertions to act on the information with confidence that it has not been spoofed or compromised.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-1-4">This document adds new "auth" array key values for a Resource Priority Header ("rph") claim defined in <xref target="RFC8443" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8443"/>, in support of emergency services networks for emergency call origination and callback. This document additionally defines a new PASSporT claim, "sph", including protection of the SIP 'Priority' header field for the indication of an emergency service callback assigned the value "psap-callback", as defined in <xref target="RFC7090" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7090"/>.
The use of the newly defined claim and key values corresponding to the SIP 'Resource-Priority' and 'Priority' header fields for emergency services is introduced in <xref target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="EMERGENCY-CALLS"/> but otherwise is out of scope of this document.  In addition, the PASSporT claims and values defined in this document are intended for use in environments where there are means to verify that the signer of the SIP 'Resource-Priority' and 'Priority' header fields is authoritative.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-2">
      <name slugifiedName="name-terminology">Terminology</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-2-1">
    The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
    described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8174"/>
    when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="new-assertion-values-for-rph-claim" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-3">
      <name slugifiedName="name-new-assertion-values-for-rp">New Assertion Values for "rph" Claim</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-1">This specification defines the ability to sign the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field namespace for local emergency communications defined in <xref target="RFC7135" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7135"/> and represented by the string "esnet.x", where x is the priority level allowed in the esnet namespace. As of the writing of this specification, the priority level is between 0 and 4, inclusive, but may be extended by future specifications.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-2">Similar to the values defined by <xref target="RFC8443" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8443"/> for the "auth" JSON object key inside the "rph" claim, the string "esnet.x" with the appropriate value should be used when resource priority is required for local emergency communications corresponding and exactly matching the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field representing the namespace invoked in the call.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-3">When using "esnet.x" as the "auth" assertion value in emergency-service-destined calls, the "orig" claim of the PASSporT <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> represent the calling party number that initiates the call to emergency services.  The "dest" claim <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be either a country- or region-specific dial string (e.g., "911" for North America or a "112" GSM-defined string used in Europe and other countries) or "urn:service:sos", as defined in <xref target="RFC5031" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC5031"/>, representing the emergency services destination of the call.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-4">The following is an example of an "rph" claim for the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field with an "esnet.1" assertion:</t>
      <sourcecode type="json" markers="false" pn="section-3-5">
  {
    "dest":{"uri":["urn:service:sos"]},
    "iat":1615471428,
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551212"},
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.1"]}
  }
</sourcecode>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-6">For emergency services callbacks, the "orig" claim of the "rph" PASSporT <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> represent the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) telephone number. The "dest" claim <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the telephone number representing the original calling party of the emergency service call that is being called back.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-7">The following is an example of an "rph" claim for the SIP 'Resource-Priority' header field with an "esnet.0" assertion:</t>
      <sourcecode type="json" markers="false" pn="section-3-8">
  {
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1615471428,
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]}
  }
</sourcecode>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-3-9">After the header and claims PASSporT objects have been constructed, their signature is generated normally per the guidance in <xref target="RFC8225" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8225"/>, using the full form of PASSporT.  The credentials (i.e., Certificate) used to create the signature must have authority over the namespace of the "rph" claim, and there is only one authority per claim. The authority <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use its credentials associated with the specific service supported by the resource priority namespace in the claim. If r-values are added or dropped by the intermediaries along the path, the intermediaries must generate a new "rph" identity header and sign the claim with their own authority.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="the-sip-priority-header-sph-claim" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-4">
      <name slugifiedName="name-the-sip-priority-header-sph">The SIP Priority Header ("sph") Claim</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-4-1">As defined in <xref target="RFC7090" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7090"/>, the SIP 'Priority' header field may be set to the value "psap-callback" for emergency services callback calls.  Because some SIP networks may act on this value and provide priority or other special routing based on this value, it is important to protect and validate the authoritative use associated with it.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-4-2">Therefore, we define a new claim key as part of the "rph" PASSporT, "sph".  This is an optional claim that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> only be used with an "auth" claim with an "esnet.x" value indicating an authorized emergency callback call and corresponding to a SIP 'Priority' header field with the value "psap-callback".</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-4-3">The value of the "sph" claim key should only be "psap-callback", which <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the SIP 'Priority' header field value for authorized emergency services callbacks. If the value is anything other than "psap-callback", the PASSporT validation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be considered a failure case.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-4-4">Note that because the intended use of this specification is only for emergency services, there is also an explicit assumption that the signer of the "rph" PASSporT can authoritatively represent both the content of the 'Resource-Priority' header field and 'Priority' header field information associated specifically with an emergency services callback case where both could exist. This document is not intended to be a general mechanism for protecting the SIP 'Priority' header fields; this could be accomplished as part of future work with a new PASSporT extension or new claim added to either an existing PASSporT or PASSporT extension usage.</t>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-4-5">The following is an example of an "sph" claim for the SIP 'Priority' header field with the value "psap-callback":</t>
      <sourcecode type="json" markers="false" pn="section-4-6">
  {
    "dest":{"tn":["12155551212"]},
    "iat":1615471428,
    "orig":{"tn":"12155551213"},
    "rph":{"auth":["esnet.0"]},
    "sph":"psap-callback"
  }
</sourcecode>
    </section>
    <section anchor="order-of-claim-keys" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-5">
      <name slugifiedName="name-order-of-claim-keys">Order of Claim Keys</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-5-1">The order of the claim keys <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> follow the rules of <xref target="RFC8225" sectionFormat="of" section="9" format="default" derivedLink="https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8225#section-9" derivedContent="RFC8225"/>, which defines the deterministic JSON serialization used for signature generation (and validation); the claim keys <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appear in lexicographic order. Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal" bare="false" empty="false" indent="3" pn="section-5-2">
        <li pn="section-5-2.1">dest</li>
        <li pn="section-5-2.2">iat</li>
        <li pn="section-5-2.3">orig</li>
        <li pn="section-5-2.4">rph</li>
        <li pn="section-5-2.5">sph</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="compact-form-of-passport" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-6">
      <name slugifiedName="name-compact-form-of-passport">Compact Form of PASSporT</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-6-1">The use of the compact form of PASSporT is not specified in this document or recommended for "rph" PASSporTs.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-7">
      <name slugifiedName="name-iana-considerations">IANA Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="json-web-token-claims" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-7.1">
        <name slugifiedName="name-json-web-token-claims">JSON Web Token Claims</name>
        <t indent="0" pn="section-7.1-1">This specification requests that the IANA add one new claim to the "JSON Web Token Claims" registry, as defined in <xref target="RFC7519" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC7519"/>.</t>
        <dl newline="false" spacing="compact" indent="3" pn="section-7.1-2">
          <dt pn="section-7.1-2.1">Claim Name:</dt>
          <dd pn="section-7.1-2.2">sph</dd>
          <dt pn="section-7.1-2.3">Claim Description:</dt>
          <dd pn="section-7.1-2.4">SIP Priority header field</dd>
          <dt pn="section-7.1-2.5">Change Controller:</dt>
          <dd pn="section-7.1-2.6">IESG</dd>
          <dt pn="section-7.1-2.7">Specification Document(s):</dt>
          <dd pn="section-7.1-2.8">RFC 9027</dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations" numbered="true" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-8">
      <name slugifiedName="name-security-considerations">Security Considerations</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-8-1">The security considerations discussed in <xref target="RFC8224" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8224"/>, <xref target="RFC8225" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8225"/>, and <xref target="RFC8443" format="default" sectionFormat="of" derivedContent="RFC8443"/> are applicable here.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <displayreference target="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls" to="EMERGENCY-CALLS"/>
    <references pn="section-9">
      <name slugifiedName="name-references">References</name>
      <references pn="section-9.1">
        <name slugifiedName="name-normative-references">Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="S. Bradner">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="1997" month="March"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4412" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC4412">
          <front>
            <title>Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
            <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="H. Schulzrinne">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Polk" fullname="J. Polk">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2006" month="February"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">This document defines two new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) header fields for communicating resource priority, namely, "Resource-Priority" and "Accept-Resource-Priority".  The "Resource-Priority" header field can influence the behavior of SIP user agents (such as telephone gateways and IP telephones) and SIP proxies.  It does not directly influence the forwarding behavior of IP routers.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4412"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4412"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5031" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5031" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC5031">
          <front>
            <title>A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services</title>
            <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="H. Schulzrinne">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2008" month="January"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">The content of many communication services depends on the context, such as the user's location.  We describe a 'service' URN that allows well-known context-dependent services that can be resolved in a distributed manner to be identified.  Examples include emergency services, directory assistance, and call-before-you-dig hot lines.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5031"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5031"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7090" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7090" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC7090">
          <front>
            <title>Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Callback</title>
            <author initials="H." surname="Schulzrinne" fullname="H. Schulzrinne">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="H." surname="Tschofenig" fullname="H. Tschofenig">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Holmberg" fullname="C. Holmberg">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="M." surname="Patel" fullname="M. Patel">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2014" month="April"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">After an emergency call is completed (terminated either prematurely by the emergency caller or normally by the call taker), the call taker may feel the need for further communication.  For example, the call may have been dropped by accident without the call taker having sufficient information about the current state of an accident victim. A call taker may trigger a callback to the emergency caller using the contact information provided with the initial emergency call.  This callback could, under certain circumstances, be treated like any other call and, as a consequence, it may get blocked by authorization policies or may get forwarded to an answering machine.</t>
              <t indent="0">The IETF emergency services architecture specification already offers a solution approach for allowing Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) callbacks to bypass authorization policies in order to reach the caller without unnecessary delays.  Unfortunately, the specified mechanism only supports limited scenarios.  This document discusses shortcomings of the current mechanisms and illustrates additional scenarios where better-than-normal call treatment behavior would be desirable.  We describe a solution based on a new header field value for the SIP Priority header field, called "psap-callback", to mark PSAP callbacks.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7090"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7090"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7135" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7135" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC7135">
          <front>
            <title>Registering a SIP Resource Priority Header Field Namespace for Local Emergency Communications</title>
            <author initials="J." surname="Polk" fullname="J. Polk">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2014" month="May"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">This document creates the new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource Priority header field namespace 'esnet' and registers this namespace with IANA.  The new header field namespace allows for local emergency session establishment to a public safety answering point (PSAP), between PSAPs, and between a PSAP and first responders and their organizations.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7135"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7135"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7519" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC7519">
          <front>
            <title>JSON Web Token (JWT)</title>
            <author initials="M." surname="Jones" fullname="M. Jones">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Bradley" fullname="J. Bradley">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="N." surname="Sakimura" fullname="N. Sakimura">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2015" month="May"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties.  The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7519"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7519"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author initials="B." surname="Leiba" fullname="B. Leiba">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2017" month="May"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8224" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8224" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8224">
          <front>
            <title>Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)</title>
            <author initials="J." surname="Peterson" fullname="J. Peterson">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Jennings" fullname="C. Jennings">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="E." surname="Rescorla" fullname="E. Rescorla">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="C. Wendt">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2018" month="February"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">The baseline security mechanisms in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) are inadequate for cryptographically assuring the identity of the end users that originate SIP requests, especially in an interdomain context.  This document defines a mechanism for securely identifying originators of SIP requests.  It does so by defining a SIP header field for conveying a signature used for validating the identity and for conveying a reference to the credentials of the signer.</t>
              <t indent="0">This document obsoletes RFC 4474.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8224"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8224"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8225" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8225" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8225">
          <front>
            <title>PASSporT: Personal Assertion Token</title>
            <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="C. Wendt">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="J." surname="Peterson" fullname="J. Peterson">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2018" month="February"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">This document defines a method for creating and validating a token that cryptographically verifies an originating identity or, more generally, a URI or telephone number representing the originator of personal communications.  The Personal Assertion Token, PASSporT, is cryptographically signed to protect the integrity of the identity of the originator and to verify the assertion of the identity information at the destination.  The cryptographic signature is defined with the intention that it can confidently verify the originating persona even when the signature is sent to the destination party over an insecure channel.  PASSporT is particularly useful for many personal-communications applications over IP networks and other multi-hop interconnection scenarios where the originating and destination parties may not have a direct trusted relationship.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8225"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8225"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8443" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443" quoteTitle="true" derivedAnchor="RFC8443">
          <front>
            <title>Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization</title>
            <author initials="R." surname="Singh" fullname="R. Singh">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="M." surname="Dolly" fullname="M. Dolly">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="S." surname="Das" fullname="S. Das">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <author initials="A." surname="Nguyen" fullname="A. Nguyen">
              <organization showOnFrontPage="true"/>
            </author>
            <date year="2018" month="August"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">This document extends the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in RFC 8225 to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority' header field, which is used for communications resource prioritization.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8443"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8443"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references pn="section-9.2">
        <name slugifiedName="name-informative-references">Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls" quoteTitle="true" target="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00" derivedAnchor="EMERGENCY-CALLS">
          <front>
            <title>Non-Interactive Emergency Calls</title>
            <author fullname="Brian Rosen">
	 </author>
            <date month="March" day="9" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t indent="0">   Emergency calls from citizens to authorities, and call back of such
   emergency calls by authorities to citizens need assurances that
   headers intended to get appropriate priority from the networks they
   traverse, and in some cases, appropriate routing.  Protection of the
   SIP Resource Priority Header and the SIP Priority header is needed
   for such calls.  This document describes the environment for placing
   emergency calls and call backs which motivate the need and use of the
   mechanisms described in other documents

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00"/>
          <format type="TXT" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rosen-stir-emergency-calls-00.txt"/>
          <refcontent>Work in Progress</refcontent>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements" numbered="false" toc="include" removeInRFC="false" pn="section-appendix.a">
      <name slugifiedName="name-acknowledgements">Acknowledgements</name>
      <t indent="0" pn="section-appendix.a-1">The authors would like to thank <contact fullname="Brian Rosen"/>, <contact fullname="Terry Reese"/>, and <contact fullname="Jon Peterson"/> for helpful suggestions, comments, and corrections.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="authors-addresses" numbered="false" removeInRFC="false" toc="include" pn="section-appendix.b">
      <name slugifiedName="name-authors-addresses">Authors' Addresses</name>
      <author initials="M." surname="Dolly" fullname="Martin Dolly">
        <organization showOnFrontPage="true">AT&amp;T</organization>
        <address>
          <email>md3135@att.com</email>
        </address>
      </author>
      <author initials="C." surname="Wendt" fullname="Chris Wendt">
        <organization showOnFrontPage="true">Comcast</organization>
        <address>
          <postal>
            <street>Comcast Technology Center</street>
            <city>Philadelphia</city>
            <region>PA</region>
            <code>19103</code>
            <country>United States of America</country>
          </postal>
          <email>chris-ietf@chriswendt.net</email>
        </address>
      </author>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
